MICROSERVICE ARCHITECTURE AND ALGORITHMS OF A MODULAR AUTOMATION SYSTEM FOR SMALL BUSINESS TECHNOLOGICAL PROCESSES

Authors

  • Yevhen Pankratov Department of Computer-Integrated Technologies of Instrument Manufacturing, Faculty of Instrument Engineering and Robotics, National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”, Kyiv, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0009-0004-1508-3053
  • Grygoriy Tymchik Department of Computer-Integrated Technologies of Instrument Manufacturing, Faculty of Instrument Engineering and Robotics, National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”, Kyiv, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1079-998X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20535/kpisn.2026.2.351804

Keywords:

microservice architecture; , small business;, digital automation;, multi-channel sales;, verification and validation;, martial law.

Abstract

Background. Small and medium-sized businesses in Ukraine operate under two simultaneous pressures: a prolonged martial law with strikes on energy infrastructure, and the need for digital transformation to remain competitive. Existing ERP and CRM systems assume stable infrastructure and large implementation budgets and are poorly suited to partial-availability operation, fast migration between on-premises and cloud environments, and phased deployment within tight budgets. This creates a need for architectural solutions for the class of small multi-channel retail-service businesses.

Objective. The paper aims to develop the architecture and algorithms of a modular digital automation system for the multi-channel retail-service small business class under martial law conditions, and to propose a verification and validation methodology for the microservice implementation of its components.

Methods. The architecture follows the principle of one microservice per business function and distributes responsibilities among nine services. Service interactions go through standardised APIs (REST, gRPC) and asynchronous messaging (RabbitMQ). The verification and validation methodology covers unit, contract, integration, end-to-end, and chaos testing. Validation was carried out on four enterprise types: retail with service support, e-commerce, food service with catering, and a full production-and-sales model.

Results. The architecture supports partial-availability operation when individual services fail, portability between on-premises and cloud infrastructure, phased deployment within tight budgets, and the absence of vendor lock-in due to the open-source stack. The proposed verification and validation methodology covers five testing levels and ties each architectural concern to a specific check type.

Conclusions. The modular microservice architecture is suitable for the class of multi-channel retail-service small businesses operating under unstable infrastructure conditions. Further work covers the collection of quantitative operational metrics and the integration of machine-learning-based forecasting modules.

References

N.D. Pankratova, H.S. Tymchyk, Ye.V. Pankratov, “Strategy of the cyber-physical system for a small business enterprise guaranteed functioning with the digital twin support.”, System Research And Information Technologies No. 2 (2024) pp. 7–20. Scopus. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.20535/SRIT.2308-8893.2024.2.01

Pankratova N.D., “Creation of Physical Models for Cyber-Physical Systems. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems,” 2020. pp. 68-77. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34983-7

Pankratova N.D., Pankratov V.A. “Evaluation of information reliability sensors of cyber-physical system,” 15th International Scientific and Practical Conference “Mathematical and Simulation Modelling of Systems. MODS '2020”, June 29–July 01, Chernihiv, 2020, Ukraine, pp. 256–260.

Pankratova N.D., “System strategy for guaranteed safety of complex engineering systems,” Cybernetics and System Analysis, 2010, 2(46), pp. 243–251.

Bass L., Clements P., Kazman R., Software Architecture in Practice, 4th ed., Boston: Addison-Wesley, 2021, 624 p.

Newman S., Building Microservices: Designing Fine-Grained Systems, 2nd ed., O’Reilly Media, 2021, 428 p.

Fielding R.T., Architectural Styles and the Design of Network-based Software Architectures, Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Irvine, 2000, 180 p.

Fowler M., Lewis J., “Microservices: a definition of this new architectural term”, MartinFowler.com, 2014. [Online]. Retrieved from: https://martinfowler.com/articles/microservices.html. Accessed: Aug. 10, 2025.

Tanenbaum A.S., Van Steen M., Distributed Systems: Principles and Paradigms, 2nd ed., Prentice Hall, 2007, 704 p.

Gorton I., Essential Software Architecture, 2nd ed., Springer, 2011, 242 p.

Ministry of Digital Transformation of Ukraine [Ministerstvo tsyfrovoi transformatsii Ukrainy], Open data sources for digital transformation of enterprises [Dzherela vidkrytykh danykh dlia tsyfrovoi transformatsii pidpryiemstv], TheDigital.gov.ua, 2025. [Online]. Retrieved from: https://thedigital.gov.ua. Accessed: Aug. 10, 2025.

Microsoft Docs, “Microservices architecture: Principles, advantages, challenges”, 2025. [Online]. Retrieved from: https://learn.microsoft.com/microservices-architecture. Accessed: Aug. 10, 2025.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-29